Freedman v. Redstone’s Empirical Analysis
753 F.3d 416 · 2014
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 162 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr · Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc. · Wyeth v. Levine · In re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation · Burks v. Lasker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“state with particularity; (A) any effort by the [shareholder] ... to obtain the desired action from the directors ...; and (B) the reasons for not obtaining the action or not making the effort.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.