Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 753 F.3d 446 - Fowler v. Joyner

Fowler v. Joyner’s Empirical Analysis

753 F.3d 446 · 2014

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
February 2022
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3599 · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Chapman v. State of California · Coleman v. Thompson · Neil v. Biggers · Stovall v. Denno

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) [T]he ineffective-assistance-of-trial-counsel claim is a substantial one; (2) the ‘cause’ for the default ‘consists] of there being no counsel or only ineffective counsel in during the state collateral review proceeding’; (3) ‘the state collateral review proceeding was the initial review proceeding in respect to the ineffective-assistance-of-trial-counsel claim’; and (4) state law ‘requires that an ineffective-assistance-of-trial-counsel claim be raised in an initial-review collateral proceeding.’ ””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the opportunity of the witness to view the criminal at the time of the crime, the witness’ degree of attention, the accuracy of the witness’ prior description of the criminal, the level of certainty dem onstrated by the witness at the confrontation, and the length of time between the crime and the confrontation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the exclusion of such evidence is the exception to the rule that favors the admissibility of eyewitness identification for the jury's consideration.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.