Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 753 F. Supp. 2d 1237 - Rinker v. Carnival Corp.

753 F. Supp. 2d 1237 - Rinker v. Carnival Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
December 2015
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 46 U.S.C. § 3507

Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · American United Life Insurance v. Martinez · United Technologies Corp. v. Mazer · Roe v. Aware Woman Center for Choice, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the existence of a contract in which plaintiff is not a party, (2) “an intent, either expressed by the parties, or in the provisions of the contract, that the contract primarily and directly benefit” the plaintiff, (3) breach of that contract by one of the parties and (4) damages to plaintiff resulting from the breach.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.