Ringham v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2002
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Floyd v. State · Goodner v. State · Sturgeon v. State · Nordstrom v. State · Wright v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A party to a superior court proceeding that has been assigned to a magistrate ... may request that an elected judge ... preside over the proceeding instead of the magistrate.... Upon a request made ... by either party, the magistrate ... shall transfer the proceeding back to the superior court judge.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[a] judge who is unable to attend and preside at his court for any cause may appoint in writing a judge pro tempore to conduct the business of this court during his absence. The written appointment shall be entered in the records of the court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ringham v. State“[lt is a defense that the person who engaged in the prohibited conduct was reasonably mistaken about a matter of fact if the mistake negates the culpability required for the commission of the offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ringham v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.