Green v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
July 2008
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Drollinger v. State · Johnson v. State · Clemens v. State · Hatcher v. State · 178 Ind. App. 631 - Holt v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“police officers are not required to give Miranda warnings unless the defendant is 'both in custody and subject to interrogation|[ ]' ") (citation omitted), trans. denied. DARDEN, Judge, dissenting. I would respectfully dissent, as I find it greatly disturbing that the simple purchase of more than one package of cold medication 23 could subject a citizen to an investigatory stop by law enforcement. The State argues that the stop was permissible because Officer McCoy had reasonable suspicion of criminal activity based upon the report by Majors that the two men had each bought three packages of ephedrine. The State specifically argues that it was the "large quantity”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bulington
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.