Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 753 So. 2d 1039 - Applewhite v. State

753 So. 2d 1039 - Applewhite v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
March 2012
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Johnson v. State of New Jersey · Rogers v. Richmond · Michigan v. Tucker · 538 So. 2d 329 - Pinkney v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Once the trial judge has `determined, at a preliminary hearing, that a confession is admissible, the defendant/appellant has a heavy burden in attempting to reverse that decision on appeal.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “This Court will reverse the trial court's finding that a confession is admissible only when an incorrect legal standard was applied, manifest error was committed, or the decision is contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.