753 So. 2d 595 - Ford v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
March 2003
most recently cited
15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 750 So. 2d 592 - Wood v. State · 705 So. 2d 1059 - Peart v. State · 659 So. 2d 1324 - State v. Fox · 701 So. 2d 388 - Rhodes v. State · 605 So. 2d 945 - Malcolm v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“neither the defense attorney nor the trial court is duty-bound to anticipate the defendant's recidivism and warn him of the sentence-enhancing consequences his plea may have for any future crimes he commits, and we conclude that Ford is not entitled to an evidentiary hearing on the matter.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.