753 So. 2d 690 - Latimore v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2013
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 750 So. 2d 643 - State v. Thompson · 531 So. 2d 708 - Thomas v. State · 661 So. 2d 1255 - Strachn v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he specific intent to commit a burglary or trespass using tools, instruments or machines in the defendant's possession or control exists when he or she engages in or causes some overt act toward the commission of the burglary or trespass, which goes beyond merely thinking or talking about it. The overt act necessary to prove intent need not be limited to the actual use of an item in committing the trespass or burglary, but need only manifest the specific criminal intent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“which either constitutes use or manifests an intent to use”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.