McIntyre v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 29, 2000

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2000-03-29

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently February 2010

4 state decisions

Relies on Anders v. California · 707 So. 2d 823 - Rollins v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-03-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Johnny McIntyre appeals his convictions for armed robbery, aggravated assault and aggravated battery. Appointed counsel has filed an Anders1 brief. Defendant-appellant McIntyre has filed a pro se brief. We conclude that the Anders proceeding is appropriate. As to appellant’s pro se brief contending that he does not qualify as a habitual offender, we conclude he does qualify. See Rollins v. State, 707 So.2d 823 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).

¶2Affirmed.

¶3. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).