Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 754 F.2d 1251 - Shelton III v. City of College Station

Shelton III v. City of College Station’s Empirical Analysis

754 F.2d 1251 · 1985

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
2
states following
August 2015
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently August 2015 · most notably Haygood v. Younger (1985), Fred B. Shelton Iii, and John Paul Jones, Cross v. City of College Station, Cross-Appellants (1986)

8 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

2001985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Parratt v. Taylor · Perry v. Sindermann

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[board member] Bailey's mere membership in a church that also opposed the grant of the variances does not by itself establish bias, nor raise an issue as to an 'irrevocably closed mind' that might justify his disqualification from the hearing....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a] persistent widespread practice of city officials or employees, which, although not authorized by officially adopted and promulgated policy, is common and well settled as to constitute a custom that fairly represents municipal policy,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a genuine dispute of material fact is demonstrated as to whether the seemingly arbitrary denials of the parking variance were reasonably based on fact.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.