Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 754 F.2d 1531 - Lonnie Gene Chatman v. J. Marquez

Lonnie Gene Chatman v. J. Marquez’s Empirical Analysis

754 F.2d 1531 · 1985

Citation profile

101
cited by 101 later decisions
1
states following
December 1997
most recently cited

89 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · Duncan v. State of Louisiana · Weaver v. Graham · Dobbert v. Florida · Lindsey v. State of Washington

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 101 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““... Appellant is entitled to the least onerous of the three possible sentences provided by the [indeterminate sentencing law] and [the newer determinate sentencing law]. The fact that one isolated factor that is less favorable to appellant may be considered under the generally more favorable statute is irrelevant, at least where the more favorable provisions of the new law fully compensate for it.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “[t]he [ex post facto] inquiry looks to the challenged provision, and not to any special circumstances that may mitigate its effect on the particular individual,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.