Mathews v. Marshall’s Empirical Analysis
754 F.2d 158 · 1985
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
January 1991
most recently cited
7 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Brown v. Ohio · Green v. United States · Whalen v. United States · Illinois v. Vitale
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a conviction obtained in violation of the double jeopardy clause cannot be modified if the defendant can show that there was a 'reasonable possibility that he was prejudiced' by the double jeopardy violation,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Morris v. Mathews“(A) No person, in attempting or committing a theft offense, as defined in section 2913.01 of the Revised Code, or in fleeing immediately after such attempt or offense, shall do either of the following:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Morris v. Mathews“evidence was admitted in his trial for aggravated murder that would not have been admissible in a trial for murder,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Morris v. Mathews
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.