Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 754 F.2d 331 - Chemical Engineering Corp. v. Marlo, Inc.

Chemical Engineering Corp. v. Marlo, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

754 F.2d 331 · 1984

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
April 2008
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently April 2008 · most notably Joshua v. United States (1994), Livingston v. Derwinski (1992)

9 federal appellate · 1 district ·

240198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1295 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1338 · 28 U.S.C. § 1927 · 35 U.S.C. § 285

Relies on Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik AG v. Murata Machinery, Ltd. · Smith International, Inc. v. Hughes Tool Co. · Asberry v. United States Postal Service · Cr Bard Inc v. Schwartz · Amstar Corporation v. Envirotech Corporation and Energy Fuels Nuclear, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “wastes the time of the court and of opposing counsel, and imposes unnecessary costs on the parties and on fellow citizens whose taxes support this court and its staff.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[n]o authority anywhere supports the notion that a preliminary injunction against infringement may issue in response to rumors of a threat of infringement.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Implicit in our mandate is the authority to recharacterize pleadings which would improperly evade the intent of Congress.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.