Shearson Loeb Rhoades, Inc. v. Much’s Empirical Analysis
754 F.2d 773 · 1985
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently March 2000 · most notably Judith Perlman v. Swiss Bank Corporation Comprehensive Disability Protection Plan (1999), Ottley Seiu v. Schwartzberg (1987)
16 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1292
Relies on United States v. Mitchell · Enelow v. New York Life Insurance · Piper v. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc. · Ettelson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance · Merit Insurance v. Leatherby Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]his court would clearly have jurisdiction under section 1291 if the district court had confirmed the arbitrator's entire award or had partially vacated the award and enforced the remainder without remanding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.