Mendoza v. Perez’s Empirical Analysis
754 F.3d 1002 · 2014
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 42 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2401 · 5 U.S.C. § 553 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 704 · 8 U.S.C. § 1188 (§ 218 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Friends of the Earth Incorporateds v. Laidlaw Environmental Services Inc · Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. Camp · Bennett v. Spear · Clarke v. Securities Industry Assn.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 129 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] rule is legislative if it ... adopts a new position inconsistent with existing regulations”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[w]here Congress has specifically declined to create a standard, the [agency] cannot claim its implementing rule is an interpretation of the statute.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence““[t]he plaintiffs - are not removed - from the herder labor-market simply- because they do not currently work as herders and have not filled out formal job applications. .'A person can involve himself in a job market by means other than submitting formal applications. - Job searches are not such rigid processes. The plaintiffs continue to. monitor the herder job market with the intention of applying for work in the industry if conditions improve .... And because the plaintiffs retained' ties to the industry, it was reasonable for them to conclude that formally applying for'jobs would be futile when they would-not accept a job offering the prevailing wage and working conditions.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.