Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 754 F.3d 425 - Grandberry v. Smith

Grandberry v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

754 F.3d 425 · 2014

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
June 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Wolff v. McDonnell · Superintendent Massachusetts Correctional Institution Walpole v. Hill · United States v. Bailey · Lebron v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation · Jimmy Walker v. J.T. O'brien, and Joseph W. Finfrock v. Craig A. Hanks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Arguments must be presented in the briefs; these were not and have been forfeited....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.