McDevitt & Street Co. v. Marriott Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently March 2014
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1961
Relies on Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. Bonjorno · Neal v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. · Reading Co. v. CJI Industries, Inc. · Handgards, Inc. v. Ethicon, Inc. · Chattem, Inc. v. Bailey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“amounts retained by Marriott due to the delay”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.