754 F. Supp. 2d 372 - Mayale-Eke v. Merrill Lynch’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. · St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'does not impose a probability requirement at the pleading stage.' It simply calls for enough fact to raise a reasonable expectation that discovery will reveal evidence of illegal motive.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Doe v. Brown Univ.“unrealistic to think that in the 21st century any sophisticated”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Doe v. Brown Univ.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.