754 F. Supp. 2d 57 - Taitz v. Obama’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

16 district ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “'in most cases, the bar stands even higher for a party to prevail on a Rule 60(b) motion for relief from judgment' than on a Rule 59(e) motion.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Hulley Enters. Ltd. v. Baker Botts LLP (In re Application for an Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782 to Conduct Discovery for Use in a Foreign Proceeding) · 351 F. Supp. 3d 11 - Arabaitzis v. Unum Life Ins. Co. of Am.

2. “mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 351 F. Supp. 3d 11 - Arabaitzis v. Unum Life Ins. Co. of Am. · 947 F. Supp. 2d 48 - Mohammadi v. Islamic Republic of Iran

3. “[t]he standards that govern Rule 60(b) are even more restrictive”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Hulley Enters. Ltd. v. Baker Botts LLP (In re Application for an Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782 to Conduct Discovery for Use in a Foreign Proceeding)