754 F. Supp. 2d 638 - Cunningham v. Electronic Data Systems Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 1001 (§ 2 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 207 · 29 U.S.C. § 213 · 29 U.S.C. § 216 · 29 U.S.C. § 218
Relies on Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. Sperling · In Re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation. · Myers v. Hertz Corp. · Morgan v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc. · Hoffmann v. Sbarro, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the court does not resolve factual disputes, decide substantive issues going to the ultimate merits, or make credibility determinations.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Even where the parties have undertaken substantial discovery, our courts have continued to use the first-stage certification analysis.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Indeed, a court should not weigh the merits of the underlying claims in determining whether potential opt-in plaintiffs may be similarly situated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.