Wilson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Mapp v. Ohio · Chimel v. California · United States v. Robinson · Ybarra v. Illinois · Thompson v. Louisiana
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Our standard of review when considering the sufficiency of evidence is well settled. We will not reweigh the evidence or consider the credibility of witnesses. Only the evidence most favorable to the verdict, together with all reasonable inferences that can be drawn therefrom will be considered.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Neville v. State · Shirley v. State“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ammons v. State“[t]he fundamental purpose of the Fourth Amendment [to] the United States Constitution [and Article I, Section 11 of the Indiana Constitution] is to protect the legitimate expectations of privacy that citizens possess in their persons, their homes, and their belongings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Turner v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.