Colorado Performance Corp. v. Mariposa Associates’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 district · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently January 2014
6 federal appellate · 2 district · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Page v. Clark · Morrison v. Goodspeed · Teodonno v. Bachman · Mince v. Butters · Hooper v. Yoder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]though two or more parties may associate together in a venture, each anticipating an individual profit to himself, no partnership is thereby created because the `chief characteristic of a joint adventure is a joint and not a several profit.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“changed circumstances have rendered the promise vitally different from what reasonably should have been within the contemplation of both parties when they entered into the contract.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.