Honeycutt v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently June 2013
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cuyler v. Sullivan · Patterson v. United States · Texas v. Louisiana · United States v. Carlson · Jetton v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The exception does not require the appellant to have actually conducted a cross-examination; instead, it only requires that he be given an opportunity to question the witness.... By requiring an opportunity to cross-examine, 12 0.S8.1981, § 2804 affords protection to the appellant's constitutional right to confront witnesses. [Citations omitted]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“as used in Section 2804(B)(1). However, we believe that this word should be used in its ordinary sense. That is,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bland v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.