Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 754 P.2d 935 - State v. Auble

State v. Auble’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 2024

10 state decisions

7019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Brown · State v. Hackford · State v. Wauneka · State v. Patterson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Wauneka held that such hearsay evidence is generally inadmissible, but may be admitted under the state-of-mind exception to the hearsay rule if it is not used to prove the truth of the matter asserted and if certain other criteria are met, specifically: (i) the evidence is probative of the decedent’s state of mind at the time of the killing, and (ii) the decedent’s state of mind has already been placed in issue by defense evidence or argument that the killing was (a) a suicide, (b) in self-defense, or (c) an accident to which the decedent contributed by acting as an aggressor. Wauneka also suggested that the evidence might be admissible if the identity of the killer is at issue.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Wetzel
  2. “we will `affirm if we can find some basis in the record for concluding that the trial court's action falls within the limits of permissible discretion under [R]ule 403.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Alonzo

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.