Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 754 P.2d 942 - Baldwin v. Easterling

Baldwin v. Easterling’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
May 1994
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 87 Ill. App. 2d 213 - Poindexter v. Willis · State Ex Rel. Nelson v. Nelson · 153 Ind. App. 149 - Neill v. Ridner · Whalen v. Young · Arb v. Glp

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It [the Utah legislature] has provided in section 78-27-24(7) that a nonresident submits himself to the jurisdiction of the courts of this state in a paternity suit under section 78-45a-l for the purpose of establishing responsibility for child support when he has engaged in sexual intercourse within this state. By negative implication, it follows that when the intercourse occurs outside this state, as it did in the instant case, the legislature did not intend to subject the nonresident to our jurisdiction in the absence of other contacts by him with our state. A serious due process question would have arisen had there been any such attempt. Barnhart v. Madvig, [ 526 S.W.2d 106 ] (Tenn.1975).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.