Williams v. Rubicon, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 2611 (§ 101 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993) · 29 U.S.C. § 2612 (§ 102 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993) · 29 U.S.C. § 2613 (§ 103 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993) · 29 U.S.C. § 2614 (§ 104 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993) · 29 U.S.C. § 2615 (§ 105 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993) · 29 U.S.C. § 2617 (§ 107 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993)
Relies on Diaz v. Fort Wayne Foundry Corp. · Sims v. Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“clearly failed to honor the statutory entitlements that Mr. Williams was afforded by the [FMLA].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“makes the employee unable to perform the functions of the position of that employee”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“complete disdain for the procedures set forth in the FMLA.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.