754 So. 2d 311 - State v. Robinson’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited
31 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Sandstrom v. Montana · Hudson v. Louisiana · Kliewer v. New Jersey · 603 So. 2d 731 - State v. Hearold
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“homicide which would be first or second degree murder, but the offense is committed in sudden passion or heat of blood immediately caused by provocation sufficient to deprive an average person of his self-control and cool reflection.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“for a verdict of manslaughter to be appropriate. State v. Robinson, 32,794 (La.App. 2d Cir.03/01/00), 754 So.2d 311 , writ denied, 00-0989 (La.03/23/01), 787 So.2d 1008 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Any objections arising from the selection of the grand jury foreperson are treated as ones alleging discriminatory selection of grand jurors. Campbell v. Louisiana, 523 U.S. 392 , 118 S.Ct. 1419 , 140 L.Ed.2d 551 (1998). All equal protection claims arising out of the selection or composition of grand juries in Louisiana remain subject to this State’s procedural requirements. Any equal protection claim that is not asserted in a pre-trial motion to quash is waived. La.C.Cr.P. arts. 533(1) and 535(D); State v. Pierre, 99-3156, 792 So.2d 899, 907 (La.App. 4th Cir.7/25/01); State v. Robinson, 32 794, 754 So.2d 311, 321-322 (La.App. 2nd Cir.3/1/00), unit denied, 00-989, 787 So.2d 1008 (La.3/23/01); State ex rel. Roper v. Cain, 99-2173 (La.App. 1st Cir. 10/26/99), 763 So.2d 1, 4-5 , unit dismissed, 00-975, 773 So.2d 733 (La.11/17/00); Deloch v. Whitley, 96-1901 (La.11/22/96), 684 So.2d 349 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.