754 So. 2d 418 - State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
September 2012
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Dorthey · 384 So. 2d 355 - State v. Bonanno · 433 So. 2d 688 - State v. Smith · 419 So. 2d 475 - State v. Lanclos
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The prosecutor merely asked questions regarding issues that had been raised by the defendant. The defendant "opened the door" to this line of questioning and cannot now complain that the state questioned him concerning these matters. See, State v. Spencer, 96-248 (La. App. 3d Cir.11/6/96), 683 So.2d 1326 , writ denied, 96-2938 (La.5/9/97), 693 So.2d 773 ; State v. Diaz, 93-1309 (La. App. 3d Cir.4/6/94), 635 So.2d 499 , writ denied, 94-1189 (La.9/16/94), 642 So.2d 191 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.