Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 754 So. 2d 519 - Mitchell v. State

754 So. 2d 519 - Mitchell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on McClain v. State · 503 So. 2d 803 - Wetz v. State · 249 So. 2d 414 - Curry v. State · 493 So. 2d 365 - Harveston v. State · 660 So. 2d 1285 - Gossett v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “¶ 5. As previously stated by this Court: A motion for a new trial implicates the discretion of the trial court and seeks to procure a new trial on the theory that, while there is some evidence in support of the conviction of the accused, the verdict of the jury is against the overwhelming weight of the entire evidence. We, sitting as an appellate court, will not reverse the trial court’s denial of a motion for a new trial unless there has been a manifest abuse of that discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.