Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 754 SO2D 539 - Berry v. State

Berry v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2016
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Newburn v. State · 507 So. 2d 898 - Shive v. State · 748 So. 2d 844 - Danner v. State · 652 So. 2d 1126 - State v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A motion for a new trial will be granted when the weight of the evidence is so overwhelming that an unconscionable injustice would result if a new trial is not granted.... In determining whether a jury verdict is against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, this Court must accept as true the evidence presented as supportive of the verdict, and we will disturb a jury verdict only when convinced that the circuit court has abused its discretion in failing to grant a new trial or if the final result will result in an unconscionable injustice....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.