Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 754 So. 2d 586 - Boyd v. State

754 So. 2d 586 - Boyd v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 2012
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 691 So. 2d 948 - Herring v. State · 460 So. 2d 778 - May v. State · McFee v. State · 551 So. 2d 188 - Benson v. State · 616 So. 2d 298 - Noe v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In determining whether a jury verdict is against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, the court must accept as true the evidence which supports the verdict and will reverse only when convinced that the circuit court has abused its discretion in failing to grant a new trial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In assessing the legal sufficiency of the evidence for a motion for JNOV, the trial judge is required to accept as true all of the evidence that is favorable to the State, including all reasonable inferences that may be drawn therefrom, and to disregard evidence favorable to the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Only when the verdict is so contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence that to allow it to stand would sanction an unconscionable injustice will it be disturbed on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.