¶1Tyrone E. Martin appeals the trial court’s ruling on his letter seeking mitigation of his sentence. The trial court treated the letter as a motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c), and denied it as untimely. We treat this appeal as petition for writ of certiorari. See Knafel v. State, 714 So.2d 1195 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Brown v. State, 707 So.2d 1191 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). Because Martin’s motion was filed well beyond the sixty-day period set forth in rule 3.800(c) and no manifest injustice has been demonstrated, we deny the petition.
754 So. 2d 793
Martin v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 24, 2000
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2000-03-24
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently February 2001
2 state decisions
Relies on 714 So. 2d 1195 - Knafel v. State · Thompson v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2000-03-24
View the full empirical analysis of this case →