754 So. 2d 827 - Wheeler v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2007
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 246 So. 2d 771 - Richardson v. State · Livigni v. State · 657 So. 2d 46 - Mattear v. State · M.N. v. State · 465 So. 2d 1349 - Peterson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]hen a court determines that the State may be prejudiced because of a discovery violation, it should make every effort to find a remedy short of excluding the witness.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Relevant evidence should not be excluded from the jury unless no other remedy suffices.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Procedural prejudice can often be cured by a continuance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.