754 So. 2d 84 - State v. Spriggs’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
October 2009
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Solem v. Helm · Sowashee Venture v. EB, Inc. · 630 So. 2d 521 - Hale v. State · McClain v. State · 558 So. 2d 1091 - Long v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] rule 3.800(a) motion to correct an illegal sentence is not the proper vehicle for challenging a sentence on the basis that it violates the constitutional prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lykins v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.