Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 754 SW2D 375 - Davis v. Sheerin

Davis v. Sheerin’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
5
states following
June 2015
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently June 2015 · most notably Hoggett v. Brown (1997), Sheerin v. Davis (1993)

27 state decisions

1301988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 127th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on In Re King's Estate · Benoit v. Wilson · Hooks v. Bridgewater · Omohundro v. Matthews · 164 W. Va. 241 - Masinter v. Webco Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[BJurdensome, harsh and wrongful conduct; a lack of probity and fair dealing in the affairs of the company to the prejudice of some of its members; or a visual departure from the standards of fair dealing, and a violation of fair play on which every shareholder who entrusts his money to a company is entitled to rely.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A. A receiver may be appointed for the assets and business of a corporation by the district court for the county in which the registered office of the corporation is located, whenever circumstances exist deemed by the court to require the appointment of a receiver to conserve the assets and business of the corporation and to avoid damage to parties at interest, but only if all other requirements of law are complied with and if all other remedies available either at law or in equity, including the appointment of a receiver for specific assets of the corporation, are determined by the court to be inadequate....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “wish to avoid declaring dividends and disburse the surplus in the form of bonuses to the officers of the corporation”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.