Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 755 F.2d 1323 - Cody v. Solem

Cody v. Solem’s Empirical Analysis

755 F.2d 1323 · 1985

Citation profile

75
cited by 75 later decisions
16
states following
August 2020
most recently cited

38 federal appellate · 5 district · 21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 75 later decisions — most recently August 2020 · most notably United States v. Smith (1993), United States v. Glenna (1989)

38 federal appellate · 5 district · 21 state decisions — followed in 16 states

28019851990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Agurs · Wainwright v. Sykes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Simply put, a consent to search is not an incriminating statement.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[W]here the state has provided an opportunity for full and fair consideration of a Fourth Amendment claim, a state prisoner may not be granted federal habeas corpus relief on the ground that the evidence obtained in an unconstitutional search or seizure was introduced at his trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “minimal role, considered in a constitutional context, simply does not rise to the level of active investigation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.