Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 755 F.2d 1391 - Dyer v. Greif Bros.

Dyer v. Greif Bros.’s Empirical Analysis

755 F.2d 1391 · 1985

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
May 1987
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Minnesota v. United States · Lambert Run Coal Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad · Salveson v. Western States Bankcard Ass'n · Washington v. American League of Professional Baseball Clubs · Aminoil U. S. A., Inc. v. California State Water Resources Control Board

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If a state court in which a case is first filed lacks subject matter jurisdiction, the federal court to which the case is removed also lacks jurisdiction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.