Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 755 F.2d 26 - China Union Lines, Ltd. v. American Marine Underwriters, Inc.

China Union Lines, Ltd. v. American Marine Underwriters, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

755 F.2d 26 · 1985

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
May 2015
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently May 2015

4 federal appellate ·

501985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Industrial National Bank of Rhode Island v. Wingate Corp. · Mitsui & Co. v. American Export Lines, Inc. · Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. · Independent Bulk Transport, Inc. v. The Vessel "Morania Abaco" · Norte & Co. v. Huffines

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There is no merit in Calvert’s argument that Health should have disclosed the difference in premiums at the outset, because, Calvert asserts, it was a factor that materially affected the risk. See Btesh v. Royal Ins. Co., Ltd., 49 F.2d 720 (2d Cir.1931); 9 Couch on Insurance 2d § 38:76 (1962). Appellant’s own witness testified that it is common for premiums on the same risk to vary as between insurers, and silence concerning well-established practices and matters of general knowledge does not affect the validity of a marine insurance contract, Anne Quinn Corp. v. American Manufacturers Mutual Ins. Co., 369 F.Supp. 1312, 1315 (S.D.N.Y.1973). aff'd mem., 505 F.2d 727 (2d Cir.1974). Moreover, there is little if any relationship between such variances in premium and the gravity of the risk. An insurer weighs its exposure against the premium which it itself, receives. 755 F.2d at 29.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “weighs its exposure against the premium which it, itself, receives.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.