Hurd v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
755 F.2d 306 · 1985
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently July 2016 · most notably Keenan v. Hall (1996), Sheinkopf v. Stone (1991)
18 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Bell v. Wolfish · Pell v. Procunier · Jones v. North Carolina Prisoners' Labor Union, Inc. · St Claire 'X' 80-1077 v. Cuyler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an opposing affidavit must set forth such facts as would be admissible in evidence and must show that affiant is competent to testify to the matters stated therein. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e).”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.