United States v. Webb’s Empirical Analysis
755 F.2d 382 · 1985
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 1 district · 16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably Goodwin v. Johnson (1997), State v. Betances (2003)
18 federal appellate · 1 district · 16 state decisions — followed in 11 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1111 · 18 U.S.C. § 7
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Edwards v. Arizona · Townsend v. Sain · Rhode Island v. Innis · Berkemer v. McCarty
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he term 'interrogation' under Miranda refers not only to express questioning, but also to any words or actions on the part of the police (other than those normally attendant to arrest and custody) that the police should know are reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response from the suspect.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““... It is left to the district court to determine whether testimony regarding the body must be excluded in light of this opinion. Because the district court admitted Webb’s statements, the issue of whether the physical evidence alone was admissible under some other theory was never presented at trial.” United States v. Webb, supra at 390.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“as conceptualized in the Miranda opinion, must reflect a measure of compulsion above and beyond that inherent in custody itself. 446 U.S. at 299-300 (footnote omitted). In this respect, the Court noted that those”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.