Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 755 F.2d 511 - United States v. Durham

United States v. Durham’s Empirical Analysis

755 F.2d 511 · 1985

Citation profile

82
cited by 82 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
December 2011
most recently cited

64 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 82 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2011 · most notably Hughey v. United States (1990), United States v. Bruchey (1987)

64 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

4801985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Satterfield · United States v. Brown · United States v. Dudley · United States v. Richard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a person who suffered injury as a result of the defendant's actions that surrounded the commission of the offense, regardless of whether the actions are elements of the offense charged.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Section 3579(a)(1) permits restitution to “any victim of the offense.” (emphasis added.) The expansive definition suggested by this language is supported by other provisions of the Act that make clear that Congress intended the definition to reach “indirect” victims such as [insurance companies].”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]he Senate Report indicates that one purpose of the Act is to remedy undesirable situations in which “insurance companies and the insurance buying public are being asked to pay off the offender’s debt.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.