Wilson v. Turnage’s Empirical Analysis
755 F.2d 967 · 1985
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently December 2002
13 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1295 · 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1631
Relies on Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. · In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions · Hayman Cash Register Co. v. Sarokin · Fuhrman v. United States Steel Corp. · Wilson v. Turnage
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“§ 1295. Jurisdiction of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (a) The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit shall have exclusive jurisdiction— (2) of an appeal from a final decision of a district court of the United States ..., if the jurisdiction of that court was based, in whole or in part, on section 1346 of this title----”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.