Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 755 NE2D 1150 - Smith v. State

Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2013
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Foss v. Foss · In re Rivera · Timberlake v. State · Dill v. State · Sales v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[elrrors in the giving or refusing of instructions are harmless where a conviction is clearly sustained by the evidence and the jury could not properly have found otherwise. An instruction error will result in reversal when the reviewing court cannot say with complete confidence that a reasonable jury would have rendered a guilty verdict had the instruction not been given.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.