State v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 19 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Burks v. United States · Richardson v. Marsh · Lockhart v. Nelson · State v. Spreigl · American Family Insurance Group v. Schroedl
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A conviction cannot be had upon the testimony of an accomplice, unless it is corroborated by such other evidence as tends to convict the defendant of the commission of the offense, and the corroboration is not sufficient if it merely shows the commission of the offense or the circumstances thereof.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“have long held that evidence is sufficient to corroborate an accomplice's testimony 'when it is weighty enough to restore confidence in the truth of the accomplice's testimony.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Smith“have a duty to instruct juries on accomplice testimony in any criminal case in which it is reasonable to consider any witness against the defendant to be an accomplice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Smith
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.