State v. Losh’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1151 (Indian Crimes Act of 1976) · 18 U.S.C. § 1162 · 28 U.S.C. § 1360
Relies on Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp. · United States v. Mazurie · Washington v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian Reservation · California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians · Illinois v. Lidster
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Subject-matter jurisdiction is a court's power to hear and determine cases that are presented to the court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re C. S. N.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.