Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 755 P2D 1084 - Carter v. Hoblit

Carter v. Hoblit’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 district · 19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently April 2017

1 federal appellate · 2 district · 19 state decisions

1401988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 67 Ill. 2d 296 - Ray v. Winter · Moore v. State · Kodiak Electric Ass'n v. Delaval Turbine, Inc. · Wolff v. Arctic Bowl, Inc. · Cousineau v. Walker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In an action upon a ... fraud, ... the running of the time within which an action may be commenced starts from ... the discovery of the fraud....” 8 . Under the common law discovery rule as we most recently summarized it, the limitátions period begins to run when”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Fraud can be established by silence or non-disclosure when a fiduciary relationship exists between the parties... . The fiduciary has a duty to fully disclose information which might affect the other person's rights and influence his action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “); AS 09.10.030 (providing action for recovery of possession of real property must be commenced within ten years). 9 . AS 34.40.010 provides in relevant part that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.