Salyers v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently March 2024
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Burks v. United States · Rosene v. United States · Huddleston v. State · Post v. State · Hunter v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The matter of defining crimes and fixing the degrees of punishment is one of legislative power.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“theory for support of premeditation. Based on our concern for the justice of the finding of guilty, and after a review of the entire record, we find that such evidence creates in our mind a reasonable doubt of appellant's guilt of First Degree Murder. The evidence of the dent and location of the bullets was known by the police and, therefore, known or should have been known by the State. We also cannot find that the evidence could have been discovered before trial with due diligence. This finding is supported by the fact that the State did not even discover the”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hunter v. State“All crimes in Oklahoma are statutory. 21 O.S.1981, § 2. No act is a crime unless made so by statute. Griffin v. State, 357 P.2d 1040, 1046 (Okl.Cr.1960); State v. Stegall, 96 Okl.Cr. 281 , 253 P.2d 183, 187 (1953). The matter of defining crimes and fixing the degrees of punishment is one of legislative power. Hunter v. State, 375 P.2d 357, 362 (Okl.Cr.1962). The essential elements of a crime are those set forth in the statutes defining the offense. State v. Layman, 357 P.2d 1022, 1033 (Okl.Cr.1960).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Morrison v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.