Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 755 So. 2d 1276 - Moore v. State

755 So. 2d 1276 - Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
September 2007
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bruton v. United States · Burks v. United States · 503 So. 2d 803 - Wetz v. State · 308 So. 2d 71 - Newell v. State · 650 So. 2d 846 - Giles v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the court may, at its option, notice a plain error not identified or distinctly specified.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 933 So. 2d 1014 - Davis v. State · 958 So. 2d 1276 - Jefferson v. State
  2. “According to the Mississippi Supreme Court, the reviewing court may address issues as plain error `when the trial court has impacted upon a fundamental right of the defendant.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 933 So. 2d 1014 - Davis v. State · 958 So. 2d 1276 - Jefferson v. State
  3. “plain errors affecting substantial rights although they were not brought to the attention of the court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 958 So. 2d 1276 - Jefferson v. State · 984 So. 2d 295 - Smith v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.