755 So. 2d 155 - Pryor v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Grant v. State · 641 So. 2d 1356 - Audano v. State · D & D Hotdogs & Beef, Inc. v. Plantation Fountains Associates Ltd. Partnership · 627 So. 2d 1279 - Williams v. State · May v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[n]either the information nor evidence at trial showed that the subject incidents occurred at different times or arose from separate acts. As such, convicting him of both counts implicated double jeopardy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.