Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 755 SO2D 170 - Toussaint v. State

Toussaint v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 110 So. 2d 654 - Williams v. State · 471 So. 2d 32 - Tillman v. State · State v. Boyd · State v. Anderson · 524 So. 2d 396 - Lloyd v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t is well settled that "the state may substantively amend an information during trial, even over the objection of the defendant, unless there is a showing of prejudice to the substantial rights of the defendant." State v. Anderson, 537 So.2d 1373, 1375 (Fla.1989).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.